Reverse Mortgages Receive Some Good PR Coverage

Posted on March 24, 2012 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

While the media often feeds into the myths and misconceptions about reverse mortgages, the past two weeks there were two pieces that provided accurate and good information about this finance option for seniors.

First was a post in the New York Times on March15th titled, “More Homeowners Seek Reverse Mortgages At Earlier Age” http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/more-homeowners-seek-reverse-mortgages-at-earlier-age/

And on March 21, NBC Today Money 911 panelists provided a good answer to a daughter who thinks she should get an inheritance rather than her mother having done the reverse mortgage. http://www.finishrich.com/blog/nbcs-today-show-money-911-march -21-2012/

The reverse mortgage provides funds for the senior’s needs and wants. It helps them have money for their security, independence, dignity and control… no matter what their age.

It’s good to see the media catching on and providing facts for a change.

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-xX

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Senior Loses Home After Listening to “Reverse Mortgages Are Bad” Advice

Posted on March 1, 2012 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

I got a call from a 65 year old woman, Ann, inquiring about a reverse mortgage stating she owed over $20,000 in back taxes and was facing tax forfeiture in just a few short months. Ann had no other debt and her home was worth more than $300,000. Based on her situation, she wouldn’t qualify for a conventional or “forward” mortgage. Someone had suggested the reverse mortgage a solution to her situation.

I explained that a reverse mortgage is a mortgage with special terms for those 62 and older. As an FHA insured loan HUD oversees the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM providing protections like no other financial option. With the HECM there are no income or credit score qualifications *(see updated information below) and no monthly payment requirements. The home would remain hers with the title in her name. And the reverse mortgage funds could pay off her tax debt and she could leave the remaining funds in a Line of Credit with a growth rate for future needs including paying her property taxes going forward. Or if she chose she could receive monthly payments, a lump sum or a combination of these options.

I went on to explain that the loan would be due and payable when the home was no longer her primary residence or on her 150th birthday. If at the time the loan was due and payable the home was sold for more than the loan balance she or her estate would receive the difference in funds. Or if the loan balance was higher than what the home could be sold for, as a non-recourse loan she or her estate would not have to come up with the difference, the FHA Mortgage Insurance covers the difference.

She of course wanted to think about it. During a follow-up conversation she said she had talked with her brother who told her she shouldn’t do the reverse mortgage because they are bad. When I inquired why he thought they were bad, she didn’t have a response. I asked if her brother could come up with the funds to pay her back taxes… “Maybe.”

I reiterated the details and benefits of the reverse mortgage emphasizing that the funds could pay the back taxes and she would have funds in a line of credit for her future taxes and that she wouldn’t have to make monthly mortgage payments. (Borrowers are still responsible for paying property taxes and property insurance.) I also offered to meet with her and her brother to educate them on the details and facts of the reverse mortgage.

A couple weeks later during another follow-up conversation, she was still hesitant because of her brother’s advice. I again inquired if her brother could come up with the funds for her back taxes… “No, he doesn’t have that kind of money!” With an inquiry if she had another way of coming up with the funds for the back taxes… no she didn’t. And her brother didn’t want to meet to learn the details and facts of the reverse mortgage. I explained that if the county foreclosed on her home she would be losing around $280,000 in equity.

Time was getting down to the wire in order for us to have time to process the reverse mortgage so I did one more follow-up call. She said her brother warned her not to do the reverse mortgage because they were “bad” and expensive. I reviewed the costs explaining they compare to a conventional mortgage other than the FHA mortgage insurance. And even beyond that the benefit of the reverse mortgage outweighed the costs… saving her home from foreclosure and the loss of around $280,000 in equity.**

A few months later when I checked the county records, the county was the owner of her property.

Listening to her brother who did not know, and was unwilling to learn the details and facts of the reverse mortgage, Ann had lost her home and a lot of equity. With all the benefits and protections, the reverse mortgage would have made a huge difference in the quality of her life.

It was sad and unfortunate that she listened to the unwise advice of “Don’t do a reverse mortgage, they are bad.”

Next time you hear “Reverse mortgages are bad” or “Don’t do a reverse mortgage” or “One should wait until their 70’s to do a reverse mortgage” remember this story and how the reverse mortgage could have made a difference.

*In April 2015 a Financial Assessment was implemented to determine borrower’s ability and willingness to pay property taxes and insurance into the future. This safeguard help make the reverse mortgage more sustainable so borrowers can remain in their home.

**Property taxes are levied and collected by counties. When property taxes are past due after a certain amount of time (redemption period) they go into tax forfeiture. In most counties across the US, to get their money quickly, the county issues a tax lien certificate or a tax deed and will conduct a sale where the tax lien certificate or tax deed are sold at auction often for only the taxes, penalties and interest due. The winning bidder receives a legal claim to the tax debt or tax lien certificate. The property owner has the opportunity to pay off the debt and reclaim the property. If the owner does not pay back the certificate then the investor often gets the entire property for only the taxes, penalties and interest due.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Why Are People So Resistant to Reverse Mortgages?

Posted on February 17, 2012 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

I was at a resource provider network meeting the other morning when a Minnesota County government agency talked about their financial and foreclosure counseling services. When I mentioned they should keep in mind that a reverse mortgage should be considered for homeowners over 62 the response was resistance. Here’s how the conversation went.

Me: “Keep in mind that a reverse mortgage may be an option for your clients who are homeowners 62 and over.”

Agency: “Our clients don’t qualify for a reverse mortgage.”

Me: “Why do you say that? Are they homeowners 62 and over?”

Agency with hesitancy: “Some, but not many.”

Me: “Well for those 62 and over a reverse mortgage may help them.”

Agency, again with hesitancy: “They are in foreclosure.”

Me: “But a reverse mortgage may help save their home from foreclosure.”

Agency, defensively: “But one spouse may not be 62.”

Me: “The requirement is that both borrowers be 62 so the younger one would need to be removed from the title, and while that is risky and not normally recommended, if it’s a matter of losing their home or being able to stay in their home, the reverse mortgage may be an option. It’s at least worth considering.*”

*I suggest they talk with an attorney so they are aware of the risks of removing a younger person from the title.

Agency: “But there may not be enough funds to pay off their mortgage.”

Me: “We can work with the banks to negotiate them taking the reverse mortgage proceeds as a payoff. It’s been done where the banks accept the reverse mortgage as a payoff. It can be a challenge but it is at least worth a discussion and a try. We have done some amazing things.

“All I’m saying is that instead of saying there aren’t options, we can’t help, the reverse mortgage should at least considered as an option and explored for those over 62.”

This conversation raises the question, why are people resistant to reverse mortgages when it can make such a difference in the lives of seniors?

Are they so hung up that it’s not their agency solving the problem they don’t think anyone can? Or is it they don’t want someone else to help? Are they afraid that someone else can help and they can’t? Is it because their funding depends on them solving the problem and it’s more beneficial to them to not help and not provide all options? Is it because they are a non-profit government agency and we are a private for-profit company? Is it they don’t think I should get paid for my services (after all as a government non-profit agency and as paid staff they are making a salary with sick days and vacation days while I’m commissioned, no paid sick or vacation days.)? Or is it they just don’t understand reverse mortgages?

I don’t understand why they or others wouldn’t want to offer an option that may benefit the seniors even if it’s not their program that solves the problem. Even if it helps just one person/couple, isn’t it worth it?

A reverse mortgage is a mortgage that has special terms for those 62 and older to use their equity while they still own and live in the home. Income and credit aren’t considered to qualify for an interest rate and monthly payments are not required during the term of the loan. The loan is due when the home is no longer the primary residence of the borrower(s).

The most common reverse mortgage, and only one available in Minnesota, is the HUD Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM which is insured by FHA. The borrowers pay a FHA Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP).

When the loan is being paid off, the borrower or the estate keep any difference between the loan balance and the sale price. As a non-recourse loan, if the loan balance is higher than the sale price on the home, the lender is repaid the fair market value and the borrower doesn’t have to pay the difference – the FHA MIP covers the difference. The loan documents spell out there is no personal liability to the borrower or their estate, unlike conventional mortgages that can get funds from the estate to cover the loan balance.

One of the other meeting attendees commented to me after the meeting, “It appears they don’t really care to be helping people.” That’s a sad impression to give when you are an agency paid to help the community.

I believe we all need to work together and offer options to help, whether non-profit, government or private for-profit. If the reverse mortgage is considered and explored but is not the right option, I want to be able to know about other options and people who may help so I can do referrals to someone who might be able to assist them. This is why I attend provider network meetings to learn about resources and options.

I wish others wouldn’t be so resistant to reverse mortgages when they can make such a difference for seniors.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Eleven Statements To Listen For Indicating A Reverse Mortgage May Be Beneficial

Posted on January 19, 2012 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

When you hear any of these eleven statements from a homeowner 62 and older a reverse mortgage may benefit them. They should be encouraged to get the facts to see if a reverse mortgage is right for their situation.

“I want to stay in my home.”
“My only option is to move.”
“I can’t afford home health care.”
“We can’t afford a mortgage payment.”
“We can’t afford to make home repairs or modifications.”
“Not enough money at the end of the Social Security check.”
“I need help with keeping up my home with housekeeping or yard work.”
“I’m downsizing and moving.” or “I’m moving closer to my children.”
They need funds for retirement planning.
They can’t afford the little extras that would help them maintain and enjoy their life.
They want Security, Independence, Dignity, and Control which they are missing in some way now.

A reverse mortgage is a mortgage with special terms for seniors 62 and older. Some of the differences include income and credit scores are not considered to qualify for the interest rate and monthly mortgage payments are not required. Rather than a 15 or 30 year term, the loan is due and payable when the home is no longer the primary residence of the borrowers or on the 150th birthday of the youngest borrower. In addition, the reverse mortgage is non-recourse, which means if the loan balance is higher than what the home can be sold for there is no personal liability to the borrower or their heirs. If the home is sold for more than the loan balance, the borrower or their heirs receive the difference. The most common and only reverse mortgage available in Minnesota is the FHA HUD insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM.

Options are available! When you hear any of the above statements remember a reverse mortgage may be the option that is the most beneficial to their situation.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Where The Heart Is: Using Technology To Remain At Home

Posted on January 9, 2012 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

I was privileged to present a webinar for GrandCare Systems webinar series:

Where The Heart Is: Using Technology To Remain At Home

You have the opportunity to listen and view the webinar.

Seniors have always wanted to remain at home. Now with the housing market where it is, seniors are staying at home even longer. We’ll discuss how using technology adds benefits to remaining at home.

In this webinar you will learn:

How housing conditions are impacting seniors remaining in their homes longer.
The benefits of using technology to remain at home.
How using technology and a reverse mortgage can be cost effective and expand the time one can remain at home vs moving to senior housing.

Access the webinar here: http://grandcare.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/1215-webinar-where-the-heart-is-using-technology-to-remain-at-home-with/

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

You Need To Know That With A Reverse Mortgage You Remain in Control

Posted on October 11, 2011 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

When sitting down with a new prospect the other day I asked what they had heard or thought about reverse mortgages. Bob responded that reverse mortgage borrowers lost control of their home and their money. Have you heard this too? I want to correct this misconception for you.

Reverse mortgage borrowers remain in control of their home. They own the home, just like with any mortgage.

They have the option to paint the home the color of their choice, plant trees or landscape as they choose, and to decorate the inside as they desire (or not make changes).

I had one borrower ask if they could paint their house purple. With a chuckle I responded they could although the neighbors may not like the color purple. The point is, as the homeowner they have the option to choose what color they want to paint their house.

Borrowers are, however, responsible for maintaining the home. This is to the homeowners best interest anyway, and whether they have a reverse mortgage, a conventional mortgage or no mortgage at all. Maintaining means things like no bare wood or chipped paint, roof replaced when needed, foundation and structure is sound, electrical and plumbing in working order.

In their will or trust the reverse mortgage borrowers still choose who will inherit the home or equity of the home.

While the reverse mortgage borrowers will be using the proceeds for their needs or wants during the term of the loan, when the home is no longer their primary residence, the loan is due and payable. The loan is generally paid back from the sale of the home with no personal liability to the borrower or their heirs. If the home is sold for more than the loan balance the borrower or the heirs receive the difference.

If an heir wants to keep the home, they have this option – they would just need to pay off the reverse mortgage balance. This can be done through a conventional mortgage, their own funds or if they were the beneficiary on an insurance policy.

Note that if the loan balance is higher than the fair market value, as a non-recourse loan the borrower or their heirs only need to pay the fair market value of the home, they do not need to come up with the difference. With the FHA HUD insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) the FHA Mortgage Insurance will cover the difference for the lenders.

They have the option to sell when they want and choose the real estate agent. If they have passed away then their estate chooses the real estate agent.

The way one wants to receive their reverse mortgage proceeds is also their choice. They can receive the funds in a line of credit, monthly payments, lump sum or a combination of these.

And how they use these funds is in their control – lenders cannot dictate how one spends the proceeds from their reverse mortgage. Borrowers can and have used their reverse mortgage funds to pay for home repairs, purchasing a new car, traveling, home care or whatever one needs or wants… it’s their choice.

The reverse mortgage provides control for borrowers to have funds so they can make their own choices. For example, where they want to live (in their own home vs government subsidized housing), who they want to care for them (vs the government deciding which home care agency they can use).

Reverse mortgage borrowers do remain responsible for paying their property taxes, having home owners insurance, maintaining the property and paying home owner association dues if applicable, just as they do with or without a conventional mortgage.

Losing control of your home or money with a reverse mortgage is a misconception. In reality reverse mortgage borrowers have control and in some cases even more control than without doing a reverse mortgage. Having funds available gives them more choices and options.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Facts Are Needed About The 101 year-old Woman Who Did A HECM Reverse Mortgage And Was Evicted

Posted on September 18, 2011 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

This last week headlines across the country talked about the eviction of a 101 year-old Detroit woman with a FHA insured HUD Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) reverse mortgage. In reading the articles and viewing the TV media pieces I find that facts were missing or misconstrued about this situation and reverse mortgages. While Ms. Texana Hollis is returning home, her story leaves a lot of misinformation about reverse mortgages and the benefits they provide to the many borrowers. Let’s take a look at the misconceptions of Ms. Hollis situation.

Foreclosure/eviction of Ms. Hollis was not due to reverse mortgage but due to lack of payment of taxes, a requirement of the loan (all mortgages as a matter of fact).
Ms. Hollis son and POA facilitated her in getting the reverse mortgage but didn’t follow through on assisting in making sure the terms of the loan were followed, i.e. he or other family members ignored the requirements to pay property taxes, insurance and maintain the home.
I’ve seen statements such as “signed the house over to a reverse mortgage.” A reverse mortgage is a mortgage with special terms for seniors 62 and older. The title remains in the borrower’s name – they are not signing the house over to anyone, they are taking out a mortgage with a lien against the property. My blog article “Beware Of Reverse Mortgage Misstatements – The Fact Is Reverse Mortgage Lenders Do NOT Own The Home!” addresses this fact.
Articles state that the son failed to make payments on the mortgage. Payments are not required on a reverse mortgage. One of the special terms of the reverse mortgage is that the borrower can have access to funds without making monthly mortgage payments. The loan is repaid when the home is no longer the primary residence of the borrower(s). The amount repaid includes the funds received up-front or through monthly payments or draws on the line of credit along with the closing costs, interest and on-going FHA Mortgage Insurance Premiums (MIP).
Ms. Hollis’ reverse mortgage funds were used for home repairs. It appears from several sources that they were also used by the son for his purchase of a car, donations to a church and other things. If this is the case, this is financial exploitation, NOT the fault of the reverse mortgage and NOT reverse mortgage fraud as some articles indicated.
Statements such as, “Ms. Hollis only learned about the eviction when the police arrived and carried out her belongings” are misleading. In reality loss mitigation notices were sent by HUD, however it appears that those who were taking responsibility to “assist” Ms. Hollis ignored these notices. I’ve seen statements that her son who is her POA didn’t tell her about the notices because he “didn’t want to worry her.” In some reports he has admitted to ignoring and throwing the notices away. She personally may not have been informed of the eviction because her family intercepted the notices. Don’t blame HUD or the reverse mortgage for actions of her family. If her family didn’t respond to notices it is neglect on their part (i.e. the son/POA) – not HUD or the reverse mortgage.

And now let’s look at the facts of the misconceptions of reverse mortgages which have been shared along with this story and other media coverage.

The bank does not own the home and the title is not passed to the bank. The title remains in the name of the borrower(s) as long as the home is the primary residence of the borrower. If the borrower does not abide by the terms of the loan (pay property taxes, insurance and maintain the home, the home may go into foreclosure just as with a conventional mortgage.)
One report stated that a danger of the reverse mortgage is if one spouse passes or goes into senior housing, the other may have to pay back the loan. In reality as long as one borrower remains in the home, the loan does not become due and payable until they, the second spouse, is no longer in the home as their primary residence. If a non-borrowing spouse (one that is not on title with the reverse mortgage) is the one remaining in the home, yes, the loan is due and payable because the borrower (the one on title) is no longer in the home as their primary residence – this is the terms of the loan.
HUD Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM) are FHA insured. As with a conventional/forward FHA mortgage, borrowers pay an up-front Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) as well as an on-going MIP. The benefits to FHA insuring the reverse mortgage include:
- Guaranteeing the funds are available for you.
- Guaranteeing the lender against default or shortfalls
- Keeping the interest rates lower, the interest rates have historically been lower compared to other mortgages.
- Providing a line of credit growth rate (available only with reverse mortgages).
- Ensuring as a reverse mortgage it is a non-recourse (no personal liability) loan. If the loan balance is higher than what the home can be sold for at fair market value, FHA will cover the difference because one has paid the MIP.
- Requiring counseling by a third party HUD trained and approved counselor.
- The HECMs are highly protected. See my Blog article “You Need To know Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Are Highly Protected.”
“The Government will step in” is another statement I’ve heard. The government doesn’t “step in,” borrowers are paying the FHA Mortgage Insurance to receive the above listed benefits.
And of course we have the all too common statement that reverse mortgages are expensive. Unfortunately, many do not look at the costs of a conventional mortgage, they just make blanket statements without really doing the comparison as I have done. I’ve written blog articles to address this misstatement:

I think it’s important to note that with a forward FHA mortgage, the up-front Mortgage Insurance Premium is 2.25% vs the 2% on the FHA reverse mortgage. So the forward FHA mortgage is more expensive than a reverse mortgage.

Ms. Hollis story has a happy ending, she is being allowed to return to her home of 50+ years according to HUD spoke’s person Brian Sullivan. Unfortunately the story still led to a lot of misinformation and misunderstanding about reverse mortgages giving them a bad name. It would be nice if the media would provide corrections and facts about these valuable and beneficial options for seniors.

Update September 24, 2011: Facts are still needed! The revere mortgage took a hit in the media with misinformation about this viable option for seniors yet we still don’t know if this was a reverse mortgage or a conventional/2nd mortgage that was on Ms. Hollis’ home. However it appears it was NOT a Reverse Mortgage but a 2nd mortgage on the home… or maybe for non-payment of taxes. Earlier in the week another article reported:

“Action News also found out the background on what really happened and why Texana and her son Warren Hollis were evicted from their home.

“At first, it was thought that Texana’s son had signed a reverse mortgage on the house or that maybe it was a back-taxes issue.

“It turns out that Warren took out a second mortgage on the home in return for $32,000. He claims the money was spent on repairs for the house. He also admits to buying a car with the money and donating some of the money to his church.

“He says the remaining $5,000 was used to pay a number of other expenses. Warren Hollis defaulted on the second mortgage and never told his mother what was going on or that he was receiving eviction notices and warnings. The news broke her heart and she had no time to prepare for being evicted.

“The house no longer belonged to Texana Hollis or her son Warren – who had been living with her. It belonged to HUD. The agency had asked for a court order to have the occupants removed from the home.

“One of the judges from the 36th District Court granted that order several weeks ago and the order was carried out on Monday.

Read more: http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/region/detroit/hud-will-give-home-back-to-evicted-101-year-old-detroit-woman-texana-hollis#ixzz1Z1RmVafp

And in another story it was reported that it was brought on by HUD due to many years of non-payment of taxes.

I wonder if we will ever know all the details and what type of mortgage it was or if it was for non-payment of taxes…

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Live in & cash out, too – Thanks, MN Good Age

Posted on August 4, 2011 by sidac

Alyson Cummings did a fantastic job on her article in the MN Good Age newspaper, “Live in & cash out, too.” She had interviewed me a few months ago to learn about reverse mortgages for this article. She said she couldn’t send me a copy prior to publication so I was nervous on whether she would provide accurate information or stick with the many misstatements that are usually in the media. Or would she misquote me or print my comments out of context.

With excitement and apprehension I started reading the article the other day when I picked up a copy. As I read I was pleased to see the acknowledgment and the many quotes. What was even better was the fact that she did an awesome job providing the facts and quoting me accurately. I’m proud to have been named and quoted in this article!

Whether you are in Minnesota or elsewhere, this is an article you should read!

Kudos to Alyson Cummings and MN Good Age on an excellent article on reverse mortgages!

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Live in & cash out, too – Thanks, MN Good Age

Posted on August 4, 2011 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

Whether you are in Minnesota or elsewhere, this is an article you should read!

Kudos to Alyson Cummings and MN Good Age on an excellent article on reverse mortgages!

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link http://wp.me/pxPEm-tv

Comparing Reverse Mortgage Closing Costs To A Conventional Mortgage – You’ll Be Surprised They Are Not That Different

Posted on July 24, 2011 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

It seems like every article, report or someone you talk with states the reverse mortgage closing costs are high. Have you looked at closing costs on a conventional home mortgage?

As with a conventional home mortgage (called a “forward” by HUD), the closing costs for reverse mortgages may vary depending on the home value and the complexity of the loan. Let’s compare the costs side-by-side for a Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM and a conventional/forward mortgage.

The third party and recording fees are standard for any loan. However, with the reverse mortgage HUD regulates the fees and requires that only the actual cost may be charged to the borrower, they do not allow mark ups such as processing or servicing fees. Look at an estimated comparison based on a Minnesota home valued at $200,000:

Third Party Fees	Reverse FHA	Forward	Forward FHA
Appraisal	$450	$400	$450
Credit Report	$20	$20	$20
Flood Certification	$16.50	$16.50	$16.50
Courier Fee*	$25	$55	$25
Escrow, Settlement, or Closing	$250	$250	$250
Abstract or Title Search	$100	$100	$100
Title Exam	$100	$100	$100
Document Preparation	$100	$100	$100
Title Insurance	$475	$475	$475
Endorsements	–	$100	$100
Recording Fees	$92	$46	$92
County/Mortgage Registration Tax	$323	$480	$480
Plat Drawing	$60	$60	$60
Name Search	$30	$30	$30
Special Assessment Search	$30	$30	$30
Counseling Fee	$125	N/A	N/A
TOTAL THIRD PARTY FEES	$2,196.50	$2,262.50**	$2,328.50

* Courier Fee is for sending a payoff on a current mortgage to the mortgage holder.

** These fees do not include all mark ups/processing fees so these may be higher when mark ups/processing fees are included.

Now let’s compare the Lender Fees:

FHA’s Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) is paid directly to FHA. With the FHA HECM Standard this is 2% of the home value and 2 1/4% for a forward. The FHA HECM Saver has a reduced MIP. The advantages with FHA insuring the reverse mortgage include:

Guaranteeing the funds are available for you.
Guaranteeing the lender against default or shortfalls which means the interest rates are lower (currently under 3% on the HECM Standard Adjustable Rate) compared to other mortgages.
Providing a line of credit growth rate (available only with reverse mortgages).
Ensuring as a reverse mortgage it is a non-recourse (no personal liability) loan.

The origination fee is what the originating lender receives to cover the loan officer’s salary, overhead to run the business, i.e. staff salaries, administration costs, computers, electricity, office supplies, marketing expense, gas mileage, health insurance of employees, etc.. The origination fee also includes the processing and underwriting costs which are generally separate and charged to the borrower on forward loans. HUD regulates the reverse mortgage origination fee to be 2% of the 1^st $200,000; 1% thereafter with a cap of $6,000. With a minimum of $2,500.

The reverse mortgage fees are based on the full home value because over time borrowers can access more than the home value at the time of origination.

An estimate based on a $200,000 home value:

LENDER FEES	REVERSE FHA	FORWARD	FORWARD FHA
Origination/Points	$4,000	$2,000*	$2,000*
MIP	$4,000	$0	$3.500
Underwriting/Processing	$0	$700	$700
SUBTOTAL LENDER FEES	$8,000	$2,700	$6,200

Backend fee**	$0	$2,000	$2,000
TOTAL LENDER FEES	$8,000	$4,700	$8,200

Prepaid Interest***	N/A	++	++

*Typical points on Forward loans are 0-4%; this example is based on $100,000 loan at 2% points.
** Forward loans often have a 1% back-end fee.
*** Number of points are directly related to interest rate charged; the more points paid the lower the interest rate; the lower points paid, the higher interest rate.

TOTAL LOAN FEES	REVERSE FHA	FORWARD	FORWARD FHA
	$10,196.5	$6,952.50	$10,528.50

Note: THE DIFFERENCE IS BASICALLY THE FHA MORTGAGE PREMIUM! Refer to above comments on the benefits of FHA insuring the loan.

Because the majority of conventional loans being done now are FHA insured, the reverse mortgage is actually less expensive.

The fees associated with the reverse mortgage are fully financed as part of the loan with no out of pocket expenses other than the FHA appraisal. (As of 2010 Appraisal Management Companies must be used to order and process the appraisal. This fee is required to be paid for by borrower up front or “out of pocket.”) All of the fees must be disclosed on the Good Faith Estimate (GFE).

Keep in mind that there has to be a cost involved because everyone in the transaction needs to be paid for there services. If the costs on a mortgage aren’t paid up-front then they’ll be paid over time with a higher interest.

When considering whether to do a forward mortgage or a reverse mortgage you must consider if you can even qualify for a forward mortgage; then if you can make the payments over time. For example, what happens if “life happens,” could you continue making those payments or would you be facing foreclosure?

You also need to consider that if you do a forward mortgage now (if you even qualify), you’ll be paying the closings costs on that loan and then when you need more funds in the future and you refinance you’ll be paying the closings costs again. These together can equal or exceed the total of the closing costs on the reverse mortgage.

Whereas with the reverse mortgage you pay the closing costs upfront and then without paying closing costs again you have access to more funds through your life as long as you are living in the home as your primary residence. The additional funds would be either through monthly payments, a line of credit if that is the type of loan you have chosen.

In the big picture the cost of the reverse mortgage is less than a forward mortgage over time because the interest rate is lower on the reverse mortgage. Therefore typically it doesn’t take too long for a forward mortgage to make up and then exceed what difference there is in closing costs of the reverse mortgage.

Now that we’ve compared the costs side-by-side, are you surprised that they are comparable to a conventional loan?

Article updated May 2012

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Minnesota Reverse Mortgages SIDAC

Minnesota Reverse Mortgage Information, Facts and News from the Experts Excelling in Service

Category Archives: Uncategorized

Senior Loses Home After Listening to “Reverse Mortgages Are Bad” Advice

Why Are People So Resistant to Reverse Mortgages?

Facts Are Needed About The 101 year-old Woman Who Did A HECM Reverse Mortgage And Was Evicted

Live in & cash out, too – Thanks, MN Good Age

Live in & cash out, too – Thanks, MN Good Age