It is NOT Reverse Mortgage Fraud When…

You may have seen some headlines about reverse mortgage fraud.  But I want to clarify that what is often being called reverse mortgage fraud is not really reverse mortgage fraud.

  • It is NOT reverse mortgage fraud when a senior who has a reverse mortgage and has a child or grandchild who scams their parent of money.  It is theft, financial exploitation, and abuse by the child or grandchild!  Children and grandchildren also steal, financially exploit and/or abuse seniors who don’t have a reverse mortgage.
  • It is NOT reverse mortgage fraud if a Power of Attorney misuses the funds from a senior’s reverse mortgage.  It is financial exploitation and abuse by the Power of Attorney, not of, or because of, the reverse mortgage.
  • It is NOT reverse mortgage fraud when a title company’s closer doesn’t follow the regulations (as the story in the recent Wall Street Journal reported) and they take the money the lender sent to pay off a borrower’s current liens.  It is theft and fraud by a title company’s closer and can, and has, happened with conventional loans.

As unfortunate as these situations are, they are NOT reverse mortgage fraud and the media should not call it such.

Let’s look at an analogy:  If a store selling TV’s is robbed because the thief was enticed and wanted the TV it is the person who did the stealing that committed the crime, not the TV manufacturer.  In this scenario the store represents the senior, both are victims.  The money or reverse mortgage funds are represented by the TV.  And the lender, provider of the reverse mortgage funds is represented by the TV manufacturer and provider of the merchandise.TV

So this is not fraud by the TV manufacture just because the thief stole the manufacturer’s TV.  Nor is it reverse mortgage fraud just because the reverse mortgage provided the funds for someone to steal from or abuse a senior.

Do you we see the media publishing articles that TV manufactures committed fraud when one of their TV’s was stolen?   Then why does the media and politicians accuse reverse mortgage lenders of fraud when someone else is committing the crime?  Why are the words reverse mortgage used in the same sentence as fraud in these types of circumstances?

For the facts the media should know read my previous posts:

© 2009 Beth Paterson, Beth’s Reverse Mortgage Blog, 651-762-9648

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link:  http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-5O

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

AARP Has It Wrong About Reverse Mortgages!

AARP often says a reverse mortgage should be a last result.  And while supporting a legislation bill regarding reverse mortgages introduced in Minnesota they sent out a message for their membership to contact Governor Pawlenty to sign the bill stating, “senior homeowners deserve to be protected from financial fraud that may lead to loss of equity or even foreclosure.”  They are using scare tactics and giving false information!

A reverse mortgage is a mortgage that has special terms for those 62 and older to use their equity while they still own and live in the home.  Income and credit aren’t considered to qualify and monthly payments are not required during the term of the loan.  The loan is due when the home is no longer the primary residence of the borrower(s).  When the loan is being paid off, the borrower or the estate keep any difference between the loan balance and the sale price.  As a non-recourse loan, if the loan balance is higher than the sale price on the home, the lender is repaid the fair market value and the borrower doesn’t have to pay the difference. The loan documents spell out there is no personal liability to the borrower or their estate, unlike conventional mortgages that can get funds from the estate to cover the loan balance.

Let’s first talk about the statement “should be a last resort.”  A last resort to what?  You’re having a hard time paying bills; your retirement portfolio has been cut in half; you’re having to work longer or have to go back to work; there are some things you want to do but are short funds to fulfill those dreams or needs; home repairs are needed; and taxes are due; or your struggling to put food on the table.  Maybe you could use extra funds for emergencies or peace of mind.  You are lacking in security, independence, dignity and control during your retirement.

So when is the time to do a reverse mortgage?  You wait and don’t do a reverse mortgage because AARP and others have said “the reverse mortgage should be the last resort.”  Why are you struggling?  Why do you do this to yourself?  Why not have the peace of mind, security, independence, dignity and control that you deserve in retirement?

Doing the reverse mortgage now instead of later could be to your advantage.  Monthly payments can be received to supplement your retirement income.  Or cash flow can be improved if a current mortgage is being paid off because payments won’t need to be made.  And if you chose the line of credit option, more funds become available in the future with the growth rate.

If you do a “forward” loan (if you can even qualify now with the tighter qualifications) you have to pay closing costs and then you make payments.  What happens when “life happens” and now you can’t make payments – you can’t work, you’re trying to decide to pay medical bills or the mortgage payments.  You’re now in a crisis.

Then when you decide it’s time to tap that “last resort” you’ll be paying closing costs a second time.  And there is the possibility that now there won’t be enough funds from the reverse mortgage to pay off that loan.  Your financial problem has gotten even bigger.  And you may end up going into foreclosure.

So again I ask a last resort to what?  Doing the reverse mortgage sooner than later could relieve a lot of stress now and in the future.

Now let’s consider the message AARP sent regarding the Minnesota legislation.  Fortunately Governor Pawlenty vetoed the bill. Yes, senior homeowners (anyone for that matter) should be protected from fraud.  However this bill would not have protected seniors, it would have negatively impacted them and possibly eliminated the reverse mortgage option in Minnesota. (Read the details on this by visiting our website www.RMSIDAC.com and the What’s New page.)

With a reverse mortgage, like any mortgage, line of credit, or other loan using an asset as collateral, one is USING the equity, NOT LOSING it.  The difference with the reverse mortgage is one doesn’t have to make payments during the term of the loan but pays it off when they move, die, or sell.  And because it’s non-recourse there is added protection over the other types of loans.

I’m not sure how the reverse mortgage could lead to foreclosure.  With the reverse mortgage one doesn’t have to make payments so that risk of foreclosure is removed.  There are risks of losing the home even without the reverse mortgage: If you don’t pay taxes, the county can foreclose; if you don’t have insurance, and there is damage to the home you could be without your home.

The reverse mortgage actually often helps seniors keep their home FROM FORECLOSURE.  Because income and credit are not considered to qualify, the reverse mortgage can be done to pay off the current mortgage, eliminate mortgage payments and save the home from foreclosure.

If AARP really cares about seniors they will stop using scare tactics and giving false information.  They will get the facts by becoming educated and then help seniors by providing accurate information.

© 2009 Beth Paterson, Beth’s Reverse Mortgage Blog, 651-762-9648

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link:  http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-9

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Continue reading