There is a lot of talk about the issues of reverse mortgage defaults causing borrowers to go into foreclosure and lose their homes because of not paying their taxes and insurance… claiming that the tax defaults are a reason one should not do a reverse mortgage. The media and so-called senior advocates are pushing this point hard. Are you aware that anyone who doesn’t pay property taxes on one’s property can face foreclosure?
If one has a conventional mortgage and doesn’t pay their taxes, the lender will pay the taxes on behalf of their borrower and increase the homeowners mortgage payments to cover the taxes. If they let their homeowners insurance drop, the lender will place “forced” insurance on the property and pass the costs along to the borrower.
Even if one doesn’t have a mortgage, a reverse or conventional, one can lose their home for not paying their taxes – the counties foreclose on them. Here in Minnesota the county claims the property as a tax forfeiture.
Ann, a 65 year old woman called me inquiring about a reverse mortgage stating she owed over $20,000 in back taxes and was facing tax forfeiture in just a few short months. Ann had no other debt and her home was worth more than $300,000. Based on her situation, she wouldn’t qualify for a conventional or “forward” mortgage. Someone had suggested the reverse mortgage a solution to her situation.
I explained the details of the reverse mortgage: A reverse mortgage is a loan with special terms for those 62 and older. As an FHA insured loan HUD oversees the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM providing protections like no other financial option. With the HECM there are no income or credit score qualifications* and no monthly payment requirements. The home would remain hers with the title in her name. And the reverse mortgage funds could pay off her tax debt and she could leave the remaining funds in a Line of Credit with a growth rate for future needs including paying her property taxes going forward. Or if she chose she could receive monthly payments, a lump sum or a combination of these options.
The loan would be due and payable when the home was no longer her primary residence or on her 150th birthday. If at the time the loan was due and payable and the home was sold for more than the loan balance she or her estate would receive the difference in funds. Or if the loan balance was higher than what the home could be sold for, as a non-recourse loan she or her estate would not have to come up with the difference, the FHA Mortgage Insurance covers the difference to the lender.
In her situation she would have had a large line of credit that would allow her funds to pay her taxes and insurance going forward… and some other life necessities or a little extra here and there to maintain or improve the quality of her life.
There are many homeowners who lose their home for not paying their property taxes. When one gets behind on their taxes, they also reduce their option of qualifying for a conventional mortgage, especially with the tighter credit and income qualifications.
And think about it, if one doesn’t have insurance on their home and there is a fire or a storm that destroys the home, the homeowner loses their home and they don’t have money to rebuild.
Another consideration regarding reverse mortgage defaults is they are minimal compared to conventional or “forward” mortgage default foreclosures. I’m sure some of the forward foreclosures included seniors who had been sold a mortgage without consideration on whether they would be able to make payments in the future. In fact I know of an 80+ year old woman who did a 30-year mortgage… what was the likelihood she would be able to make mortgage payments for 30 years? A reverse mortgage would have been a better loan choice for her.
When the senior homeowners with forward mortgages have had “life happen” and they couldn’t make the payments, they also didn’t qualify for a reverse mortgage because they owed more than the reverse mortgage proceeds, they went into foreclosure. (We often receive calls from seniors in this situation and have to say we can’t do the reverse mortgage for them.) If these seniors had done the reverse mortgage initially instead of doing the forward mortgage, they would be benefitting from no mortgage payments and having funds to pay their taxes and insurance as well as for their other needs.
Reverse mortgages make a huge positive difference in the life of senior homeowners; the majority of reverse mortgage borrowers are satisfied with their reverse mortgage. Reverse mortgages shouldn’t be discounted because a small percentage are in default.
When reverse mortgage borrowers haven’t paid their taxes the lenders/servicers work with the borrowers to find ways to help them including sending them to counselors who work with borrowers to find a way to assist them address the issue.
Unfortunately, Ann’s brother had told her reverse mortgages are bad and she shouldn’t do one and she listened to him. Consequently the county foreclosed on her. She not only lost her home and a place to live, she lost the $280,000+ in equity. Whereas a reverse mortgage could have saved her home from foreclosure and she would have been able to pay her taxes and remain in her home with funds for other needs or desires including paying her future taxes and insurance.
So you see, reverse mortgage tax defaults are really defaults on taxes with a reverse mortgage in place and are not the only reason seniors can lose their home – they happen with conventional or no mortgages at all as well. The media and politicians should stop attacking the reverse mortgage industry as the bad guys and gals – counties across the country are foreclosing on seniors’ homes too.
*To address the issue of tax and insurance defaults, in the near future we anticipate financial assessments with the reverse mortgage to determine if the borrowers are able to pay property taxes and insurance into the future.
©2012 Beth Paterson, Beth’s Reverse Mortgage Blog, 651-762-9648
This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-YU
- Senior Loses Home After Listening to “Reverse Mortgages Are Bad” Advice
- Reverse Mortgage Borrowers’ Responsibilities… Or Consequences
- You Need To Know Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Are Highly Protected!
- A Reverse Mortgage Can Really Be Compared To Your Smart Phone
- A Reverse Mortgage Or A Conventional Mortgage For Senior Homeowners? That Is The Question.
- AARP Has It Wrong About Reverse Mortgages
- Do You Go To A Plumber For Health Issues? Then Why Would You Receive Advice on Reverse Mortgages From A Politician?
- At The Eleventh Hour… Reverse Mortgage Used To Save Senior’s Home
- Be Cautious On Reverse Mortgages… And From Who You Are Getting Your Reverse Mortgage Information
- The Media Needs The Reverse Mortgage Facts
- But Wait, There’s More… Reverse Mortgage Facts The Media Needs To Know
- It Is NOT Reverse Mortgage Fraud When…
- Who Should You Believe About Reverse Mortgages?
- Is your opinion of reverse mortgages denying seniors?
- Questions About Reverse Mortgages Continue Receiving Misinformation As Responses
- Irrational Statements Show Ignorance of Reverse Mortgages
- Seventeen Facts About Reverse Mortgages That You May Not Know
- “Our Reverse Mortgage Is Great. Gives Us Some Elbow Room.” And More Testimonies by Reverse Mortgage Borrowers
- A Reverse Mortgage Or…? Other Options To Consider
- What To Consider When Choosing Your Reverse Mortgage Originator
Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.
This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.