“Own Your Future Minnesota” Campaign Launched – How are you personally preparing for your long-term care needs?

Posted on October 2, 2012 by sidac

The Own Your Future Minnesota campaign is part of a national educational campaign of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that promotes personal preparation for long-term care. The campaign is to bring awareness as well as urge Minnesotans of the need to plan for their later years when they are likely to need long-term care.

Own Your Future is important to Minnesota! Between 2010 and 2030 Minnesotans over age 65 will grow by 107%. Those over 65 have a 70% chance of needing long-term care. In 2030 over 325,000 elderly would need to be served if Medicaid (Medical Assistance) had to serve all with insufficient income. This could cost $5 Billion by 2030. Because of the enormous growth in the aging population and the number without resources, Medicaid will be strained to provide support for all these individuals.

Own Your Future Minnesota is encouraging people to have discussions, and be aware of options to pay for their long-term care including considering personal savings, long-term care insurance, life insurance options, annuities, and using ones home equity including reverse mortgages. Additionally they are encouraging people to discuss and plan their advance care which refers to their legal documents.

With the October 2nd launch, Governor Mark Dayton and Lieutenant Governor Yvonne Prettner Solon are urging all Minnesotans age 40 to 65 to own their future by mailing a letter to them.

“Planning for long-term care helps to ensure choice, control and peace of mind for the individual,” said Lt. Gov. Yvonne Prettner Solon. “The sense of security and comfort that comes with having a plan is something all Minnesotans should enjoy.”

The first phase of Minnesota’s Own Your Future initiative includes a new website, public service announcements, internet advertising, community meetings and other employer and grassroots organizations. The website offers options for planning at various ages, tools for your planning covering your personal, financial, housing and advance care planning, as well individual’s stories.

Future phases of Own Your Future will look at development of affordable financial products to help people pay for long-term care and evaluation of possible changes to Medicaid to better align with and encourage private payment for long-term care.

As a member of the Advisory Panel, and on the speakers bureau, through the coming year I will be doing presentations around the Twin Cities to bring clarity on what is long-term care, the impact it has on individuals and their families, why plan ahead along with options and resources to consider.

I’m proud and excited to be part of this important state initiative as the reverse mortgage industry representative.

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-YS

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Seniors Find Hope and Opportunity With Reverse Mortgages

Posted on April 8, 2012 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

It’s the season of hope and new growth and opportunity. Flowers are blooming, trees are budding, the grass is growing. As with the season, seniors can find this hope, new growth and have new opportunities that they can remain in their home with security, independence, dignity and control. And like the many types of flowers, buds and new growth, the variety of how the reverse mortgage funds are used and numerous, basically endless. Here are some of the ways seniors have found hope and opportunity with their reverse mortgage.

Stay in one’s home where they may have raised their family, are familiar with the neighborhood and their neighbors and where they usually want to remain.
Pay off a current mortgage to eliminate the monthly mortgage payments.
Save one’s home when faced with foreclosure or tax forfeiture.
Have improved cash flow with no monthly mortgage payments.
Have funds for making home improvements or home modifications.
Retire and not feeling like you have to work just to have money to pay the bills.
Have cash flow to be able to pay taxes.
Have funds to pay for home health care.
Have funds for some assistance with home care or companion services.
Have funds for adult day services.
Have funds for medical expenses and prescriptions.
Afford going to the dentist.
Afford new eye glasses.
Have funds for the needed hearing aid.
Have funds to cover long term care expenses.
Cover everyday living expenses.
Not rely on credit cards.
Not rely on children.
Have funds for the little extras in life, like:
- getting one’s hair done,
- having cable TV,
- buying groceries,
- going to lunch with friends,
- treating their children to dinner,
- going to community plays or the theater or a concert,
- taking the grandchildren to the zoo or a movie,
- Depends (I had a client say with their reverse mortgage they could now afford to buy Depends),
- being able to do hobbies.

Purchase a more dependable car
Afford transportation if one can no longer drive.
Afford the travel for the family wedding or reunion.
Take the vacation they have dreamed of all their life.
Protect some of their other retirement funds or investments where there might be taxes or penalties on withdrawals.
Purchase a new home to downsize and/or move closer to family
Have funds for emergencies.
Reduce financial stress.
Have funds to full fill needs and goals.
To live with security, independence, dignity and control.

It’s fulfilling to me to be able to help seniors find hope, growth, and opportunity with reverse mortgage (visit the links below for some stories). A reverse mortgage has given hope and opportunity to thousands of Minnesota seniors so they can remain in their home with security, independence, dignity and control even during trying times. If you know a senior who is looking for hope and opportunity, a reverse mortgage may be their answer.

To determine if a reverse mortgage is right for one’s situation, talk with an experienced licensed reverse mortgage expert to get the facts. Learn some of the facts at our website: www.RMSIDAC.com. “What to Consider When Talking With Reverse Mortgage Lenders” will help you determine questions to ask when choosing your originator.

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-y9

Related articles of stories on how seniors have used the reverse mortgage and how it’s made a difference in their lives:

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Minnesota 7-Day Cooling Off Period Law is Disservice to Seniors

Posted on July 17, 2011 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

It’s coming up on a year since the Minnesota law went into effect requiring a 7-day cooling off period in addition to the Federal 3-day recission period on all refinances. No matter how much I explain that the law was put into place by legislators with the intention of protecting them, since then every borrower has complained about waiting an extra 7 days. Borrowers have stated:

“I’m being treated like a child, not letting me decide that I’m ready to proceed.”
“Why do I have to wait extra time, I’ve already waited long enough.”
“How fast can we close? I’ve already made up my mind.”
“I took a year to decide, I don’t need more time.”
“This takes away my dignity.”

Or variations of the above but all with the same message.

Borrowers have the right to cancel their loan at any time during the processing which usually takes 30 to 45 days. They are in control of whether they want to proceed or not during the entire time. And after closing they have the Federal 3-day recission period during which time they can also choose to cancel their loan. The additional 7 days is an irritation rather than a protection!

Consequently the Minnesota law makers did nothing to protect seniors when they passed this unnecessary law in the 2010 Minnesota Legislation. If they really want to protect seniors they should look at other things that would be true protections, not putting in unnecessary regulations.

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety and without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/pxPEm-sR.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Reverse Mortgages Give Reasons For Hope

Posted on April 22, 2011 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

As I was reflecting on the hope that this season brings I got to thinking about the reasons the reverse mortgage gives hope to seniors. Here are some of the reasons for hope with a reverse mortgage. Yes, the list is long but seniors have a long list of wants and needs for hope. With a reverse mortgage one will be able to:

Stay in one’s home where they may have raised their family, are familiar with the neighborhood and their neighbors and where they usually want to remain.
Pay off a current mortgage to eliminate the monthly mortgage payments.
Save one’s home when faced with foreclosure or tax forfeiture.
Have improved cash flow with no monthly mortgage payments.
Have funds for making home improvements or home modifications.
Retire and not feeling like you have to work just to have money to pay the bills.
Have cash flow to be able to pay taxes.
Have funds to pay for home health care.
Have funds for some assistance with home care or companion services.
Have funds for adult day services.
Have funds for medical expenses and prescriptions.
Afford going to the dentist.
Afford new eye glasses.
Have funds for the needed hearing aid.
Have funds to cover long term care expenses.
Cover everyday living expenses.
Not rely on credit cards.
Not rely on children.
Have funds for the little extras in life, like:
- getting one’s hair done,
- having cable TV,
- buying groceries,
- going to lunch with friends,
- treating their children to dinner,
- going to community plays or the theater or a concert,
- taking the grandchildren to the zoo or a movie,
- Depends (I had a client say with their reverse mortgage they could now afford to by Depends),
- being able to do hobbies.

Purchase a more dependable car
Afford transportation if one can no longer drive.
Afford the travel for the family wedding or reunion.
Take the vacation they have dreamed of all their life.
Protect some of their other retirement funds or investments where there might be taxes or penalties on withdrawals.
Purchase a new home to downsize and/or move closer to family
Have funds for emergencies.
Reduce financial stress.
Have funds to full fill needs and goals.
To live with security, independence, dignity and control.

I have helped seniors where a reverse mortgage has fulfilled all of these reasons and more, providing hope for their future (visit the links below for some stories). A reverse mortgage has given hope to thousands of Minnesota seniors so they can remain in their home with security, independence, dignity and control even during trying times. If you know a senior who is looking for hope for one of the above reasons, a reverse mortgage may be their answer.

This material may be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/pxPEm-pQ

Related articles of stories on how seniors have used the reverse mortgage and how it’s made a difference in their lives:

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Who Should You Believe About Reverse Mortgages?

Posted on July 31, 2010 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

With the media publishing articles about reverse mortgages by so called reporters and comments by professionals (financial, CPA, attorney), legislators, and the general public, everyone has an opinion about reverse mortgages. The many articles that have surfaced about reverse mortgages including in MSNBC, Time Magazine, Parade Magazine, Consumer Reports, and the National Consumer Law Center Report all provide information trying to give the impression the reporters have done their research.

Unfortunately these so called reporters have NOT done their research and their articles are NOT based on facts of reverse mortgages. They don’t have documentation supporting their statements. If they had done their research and had the documentation to support their statements the articles would read much differently. Consequently the articles misrepresent reverse mortgages and are painting negative images based on the so called reporters’ biased opinions which spread the misconceptions and misunderstandings of reverse mortgages.

Even the articles that outline the facts have comments that reflect ignorance of reverse mortgages. And the sad point is that people are believing these sources who don’t have the facts or take the time to get the facts.

Think about it. Would you go to a plumber for health issues? Of course not! You go to a doctor. And don’t you go to a specialist for the area of your concern, i.e. a heart specialist for heart disease? So why go to the media, professionals, legislators or others instead of going to a reverse mortgage specialist for the facts on reverse mortgages?

Let me share 15 facts about reveres mortgages that are often misunderstood:

A reverse mortgage is a mortgage just like any home equity loan where one uses the equity of the home but it has special terms for seniors 62 and older.
The lender or bank does NOT own the home – YOU OWN THE HOME, you keep the title and are responsible for property taxes and insurance, association dues (if applicable), maintaining the property and abiding by the terms of the loan.
There are no income or credit score requirements to qualify for the FHA Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM). (Some proprietary jumbo reverse mortgages may have credit qualifications.)
No monthly mortgage payments are required.
There is no limitation on how the funds can be used.
Offers more options – Funds can be received in monthly payments structured for life or as needed, line of credit (with a growth rate), lump sum, or a combination of these.
Social Security and Medicare are not affected because it is a loan, not considered income.
Medicaid (Medical Assistance (MA) in Minnesota) and other government benefits can still be received with the reverse mortgage.
Borrowers can stay in the home as long as it is their primary residence or in the case of a couple as long as one borrower is still in the home as their primary residence. The due date on the mortgage is the youngest borrower’s 150th birthday.
At the time of sale if the home is sold for more than the loan balance, the borrower(s) or their heirs receive the difference. The lender or bank does NOT keep the difference!
The loan is non-recourse which means there is no personal liability to the borrower or their heirs if they are not retaining ownership. So borrowers or their heirs don’t have to come up with the difference if the loan balance is higher than what the home is be sold for as long as they are not retaining ownership. Borrowers are not leaving a debt to their children.
As borrowers use the funds/equity and are not making monthly payments the loan balance increases meaning because they used the money now, there will be less available when the loan is being repaid. (With a conventional mortgage one is using the equity but making monthly payments which repays the interest and a portion of the principal each month.)
Fees are regulated and only HUD allowed fees are permitted with no mark-ups or junk fees. Even though many times they are considered expensive or high they compare to conventional loans, in fact the difference comes down to the FHA Mortgage Insurance Premium. You can see a comparison of the costs in my article, “Reverse Mortgage Costs – High or Mythical?” and “Do You Understand The Reverse Mortgage Closing Costs?”
FHA offers and insures through HUD the majority of reverse mortgages known as the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage or HECM, making it the most highly regulated mortgage available. The advantages include:
- Guaranteeing the funds are available for you.
- Guaranteeing the lender against default or shortfalls which means the interest rates are lower (currently under 3% on the adjustable rate; 5.56% on the fixed) compared to other mortgages.
- Providing a line of credit growth rate (available only with reverse mortgages).
- Insuring as a reverse mortgage it is a non-recourse (no personal liability) loan.
The HECM borrowers are highly protected. See my Blog article “You Need To know Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Are Highly Protected!”

These facts are all supported in the documents signed at application and at closing including the Important Terms and the Loan Agreement. With the reverse mortgage the sample closing documents are required to be provided to borrowers at the time of application so they have the opportunity to review, have their family and/or attorney review the documents before signing. If they read them they will have the facts as outlined above.

One would think it is a simple answer to the question, “Who Should You Believe About Reverse Mortgages?” However seeing the many articles along with the comments it appears people believe the wrong source. So are you going to believe the media and non reverse mortgage professionals about reverse mortgages? I encourage you to get the facts from a reverse mortgage specialist just as you get your health facts from the health care specialist. Then decide if it is right for your situation.

This material my be re-posted provided it is re-posted in its entirety and without modifications and includes the contact information, copyright information and the following link: http://wp.me/p4EUZQ-n4

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Fast Forward To August… Seniors Would Have Lost Their Home To Foreclosure Under New Minnesota Reverse Mortgage Law

Posted on June 22, 2010 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

A couple days ago I shared the story of how the reverse mortgage was used to save Ken and Mary’s home from foreclosure. While we were able to make this happen now in just the 3 weeks we had, if we had received the call from Ken and Mary after August 1, 2010 when the new Minnesota reverse mortgage law is in affect, the ending would be different.

Because of the new 7-day “cooling off” period requirement, Ken and Mary would have lost their home. Why? Because the new law requires that borrowers receive and sign a commitment and then wait 7 days before the loan can be closed. This is in addition to the 3-day federal required rescission.

Let’s look at the timing. The loan was underwritten and cleared on a Friday, just 5 days before the payment was needed to be in the sheriff’s office. This, from my understanding is when the commitment would be issued. So if the commitment was issued on a Friday, the borrowers would need to receive the commitment, sign it and return it. Even if this was able to be implemented on Friday, the borrowers would need to wait 7 days before the closing could take place. (I’m assuming actual days, not excluding Sundays and Holidays as the 3-day rescission period does – this has yet to be defined.)

The 7th day would be the following Friday, already 2 days past the redemption date. Then we have the 3-day rescission period, Saturday, Monday, Tuesday. Funding would take place on the next Wednesday. This would have been 7 days after the redemption period. Seven days too late!

An additional risk of delay as a result of the new law could be the counseling. Currently reverse mortgage borrowers can receive counseling from HUD-approved counselors in the state or from a list of national counselors.

The new Minnesota law requires the reverse mortgage borrowers only receive counseling from HUD-approved counselors located in the state. Because there are only 7 counseling agencies in the state of Minnesota, with all borrowers needing to receive the counseling from these 7 agencies, borrowers could face a longer wait time to receive their counseling. Even now scheduling times with a counselor can be 2 to 3 weeks out. While they make some exceptions if one is in foreclosure, there could still be a longer wait to receive the counseling, not necessarily the next day as Ken and Mary were able to receive now.

Being processing of a reverse mortgage cannot start until after borrowers have received and signed the counseling certificate, the longer time frame could also mean the seniors losing their home.

The law makers, in an effort to “protect” seniors, will be causing some seniors to lose their home to foreclosure. Interesting enough the reverse mortgage bill was added as an amendment to the foreclosure bill.

I’m glad we were able to help Ken and Mary save their home. It’s going to be a sad day come August 1st when we have to tell the “Ken’s and Mary’s” who call us and say we have 3 weeks to redeem our home from foreclosure, “Sorry, we can’t take your application, process, close and fund the loan in that time frame because there is a new law that says you have to find a counselor in Minnesota that can do your counseling tomorrow and then after the file is underwritten and ready to close you have to have a 7-day cooling off period in addition to a 3-day rescission period.” This will break my heart.

In my opinion, one senior losing their home because of the new law and an extra unnecessary “cooling off” period is one too many!

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

A Letter to Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty Regarding Reverse Mortgages

Posted on May 17, 2010 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

From the time I first heard about the proposed reverse mortgage legislation in 2009, SF489, I have been writing to and in contact with MN Governor Pawlenty’s office. This year even prior to having details of the bill I started contacting Governor Pawlenty’s office, sending emails regarding the suspected legislation. After Friday evening May 14, 2010 when I finally found the details of the bill SF2430 I again sent Governor Pawlenty a message requesting a veto this time outlining with the details of the issues of the bill. Following is the latest letter I sent to him requesting a veto.

Dear Governor Pawlenty,

After having time to review the reverse mortgage amendment to SF2430/HF2699 I want to provide the reasons why this reverse mortgage legislation should be vetoed.

Besides the facts I have pointed out previously:

This bill has not been transparent – the amendment was just added on the afternoon of May 14, 2010 with no prior knowledge of the details to those of us in the reverse mortgage industry.
This reverse mortgage legislation is controversial. Any reverse mortgage legislation should not happen without a full hearing.
While it appears they pulled the language of suitability, this bill still contains some of the same language as the 2009 SF489/HF528 which was vetoed last year which would mean increased costs to reveres mortgage borrowers and/or cause some lenders to refrain from offering reverse mortgages in Minnesota.

The main issues include:

1. Why should a lender receive a civil penalty an dhave to pay $1,000 for something a counselor does or doesn’t do? Who and how is this going to be overseen?

The language of this is subjective setting up an opportunity for litigation and lenders may decide not to lend in the state if there is a risk of civil penalty for something they have no control over.

Implementing state laws that are different than the HUD requirements will make it more difficult for prospective borrowers to receive counseling.
- Some of the counseling opportunities currently available to our Minnesota borrowers will no longer be an option as some of the counseling agencies may decide that with different regulations they will not provide counseling in the state.
Having the state oversee counseling different than the HUD requirements is likely to be costly for the state in seeing that these regulations are followed by counselors in the state as well as across the country.

2. Adding the language for Lender default and forfeiture may mean lenders will choose not to loan with this requirement and HUD may choose not to insure the loans with these requirements.

3. Seven-day cooling off period; right of rescission will mean the loans will be more expensive for seniors and without the opportunity to waive the provision under certain circumstances such as foreclosure may mean that seniors could lose their home because the reverse mortgage could not be done timely.

It appears they changed the 10-day rescission period language to a seven-day cooling off period but it would have the same negative consequences as the 10-day rescission period.
Language is vague and subjective, i.e. “written commitment to make the reverse mortgage loan. “ What does “written commitment” mean? This makes it more likely for litigation.

4. This law would be additional costs to the state. While the bill may not be showing as a having a budget expenditure, there would be additional costs to the state in overseeing that state laws are followed versus the difference from the federal regulations. If the loan becomes more expensive to seniors and/or lenders choose not to loan in the state more seniors are likely to lose their homes without the reverse mortgage option. Consequently the foreclosures would increase and more housing would be needed for seniors and much of this would be born as state expense.

5. All lenders do not have to abide by the state rules. Federal chartered banks do not have to abide by the state rules because they are federal chartered yet brokers and non-federal chartered banks and lenders would have to follow any state laws. This would be a monopolistic-like advantage for the FDIC banks over other lenders. This obviously does not foster fair competition between all lenders and small business.

6. Seniors can apply for and if they qualify can receive a conventional or home equity loan to refinance without all the regulations that are done with a reverse mortgage. Sometimes they may feel it is easier and less invasive to do so. Unfortunately many who have taken a conventional or home equity loan run into problems making the required monthly payments then inquire about a reverse mortgage. With the lower home values many times these seniors do not qualify for the reverse mortgage and then often face foreclosure and lose their homes. Or they may just use credit cards to finance their retirement expenses then run into problems when they can’t make the payments. There aren’t additional requirements for seniors to qualify for credit cards. And there aren’t additional requirements for seniors to take out a car loan. So why have such tight regulations on reverse mortgages when seniors can make other choices that could be more detrimental to them.

7. Implementing this legislation is insulting to our seniors who have worked hard all of their lives – they are not children, they have lots of experience and knowledge – some that we could and should learn from – so why are we treating them like children? They have the right to be educated on their options then decide what is right for their situation, not have legislators, counselors, or lenders make decisions for them.

Keep in mind that: A reverse mortgage is a mortgage just like any other loan but has special terms for seniors 62 and older. And besides the special terms to benefit them to qualify and improve their life the reverse mortgage borrowers are already highly protected (see attached article)! I would like to educate those making legislative decisions on the facts and terms of reverse mortgages then determine what legislation needs to be implemented for proprietary reverse mortgages.

Again, I ask that you veto the reverse mortgage legislation SF2430/HF2699 to protect Minnesota Seniors and the reverse mortgage businesses.

Thank you,

Beth Paterson
Executive Vice President
Prestige Mortgage LLC
Reverse Mortgages SIDAC
Security, Independence, Dignity and Control
The Experts Excelling In Service
Phone: 651-762-9648
Toll Free: 1-877-590-9648
Fax: 651-653-0878
Be sure to visit our website and
Blog for reverse mortgage facts and details:
www.RMSIDAC.com and
http://BethsReverseMortgageBlog.wordpress.com
Follow on http://Twitter.com/RMSIDAC

While Governor Pawlenty recognizes the issues as he stated in his 2009 veto letter, the unfortunate fact is that this legislation was not a stand alone bill but is attached to a foreclosure bill and without the line-item-veto authority may be signed into law. If this is the case it will be very unfortunate for Minnesota seniors as well as the reverse mortgage industry.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Down To The Wire… The MN Reverse Mortgage Amendment Was Sneaked In and Likely To Have Negative Consequences For Seniors And Reverse Mortgage Businesses

Posted on May 14, 2010 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

Not disclosing any of the details before hand, the reverse mortgage amendment was added to bill SF2430/HF2699. Being passed in Congress we now hope to receive a veto from Governor Pawlenty to protect Minnesota Seniors and the reverse mortgage businesses.
I along with others have concerns about the bill:

This bill has not been transparent. While I have been inquiring and searching for information for months, I did not learn the bill number or the details of the bill until the evening of May 14th – just before the May 17th end of the 2010 legislation session.
This reverse mortgage legislation is controversial. Any reverse mortgage legislation should not happen without a full hearing. And without all of us impacted, especially brokers and lenders who are not federal chartered banks having an opportunity to see and address any proposed legislation.
This law would mean increased costs to reverse mortgage borrowers and/or cause some lenders to refrain from offering reverse mortgages in Minnesota. As with the 2009 SF489/HF528 bill which Governor Pawlenty vetoed last year this bill still contains some of the same language and would have the same impact.
Reverse Mortgage Borrowers are highly protected – why confuse the issue with state laws. Currently the only reverse mortgages available in Minnesota are the FHA insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgages or HECMs and these are highly protected and regulated by HUD. Visit my blog, “You Need To Know Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Are Highly Protected!” for details.
There are so many changes on the Federal level it would be a disservice to Minnesota seniors to implement state laws. The state would have to oversee any differences from federal regulations.
This law would be additional costs to the state. While the bill may not be showing as a having a budget expenditure, there would be additional costs to the state in overseeing that state laws are followed versus the difference of the federal regulations. More seniors are likely to lose their homes without the reverse mortgage option. Consequently the foreclosures would increase and more housing would be needed for seniors and much of this would be born as state expense.
All lenders do not have to abide by the state rules. Federal chartered banks do not have to abide by the state rules because they are federal chartered yet brokers and non-federal chartered banks and lenders would have to follow any state laws. As I sated in my blog, “Do You Know The Best Kept Reverse Mortgage Secret in Minnesota?,” this would be amonopolistic-like advantage for the FDIC banks over other lenders. This obviously does not foster fair competition between all lenders and small business.

If Govenor Pawlenty signs the SF2430/HF2699 bill into law there will be negative consequences to our Minnesota seniors as well as reverse mortgage brokers and lenders in Minnesota.

While some are claiming the changes made from the 2009 bill now has widespread support, those of us in the reverse mortgage industry have not had an opportunity to review or address this legislation – we are NOT supporting it. Sneaking this legislation on at the last minute when it has not been transpartnet and is so controversial seems to me does not fit into the democratic consitution of our country or state.

I have asked that Governor Pawlenty veto the bill so we in the industry, who are senior advocates and would be directly impacted by the law chances, have the opportunity to review and address as well as write proposed legislation that will be in favor of protecting seniors as well as the reverse mortgage businesses.

Please join me in requesting Governor Pawlenty veto SF2430/HF2699 by sending him an email at tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us. Use my above outlined issues as reasons for your request for a veto.

Thank you for your assistance in protecting Minnesota seniors as well as revesre mortgage borrowers.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Do You Know The Best Kept Reverse Mortgage Secret in Minnesota?

Posted on May 7, 2010 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

During the 2009 Minnesota Legislation Session a reverse mortgage bill, SF489/HF528 was introduced and then passed by the Senate and House but eventually vetoed by Governor Tim Pawlenty. During this session I was very involved in addressing my concerns as a reverse mortgage originator, processor and senior advocate, testifying against the bills at every hearing, writing to the Attorney General Lori Swanson, the authors of the bills, Senator Tarryl Clark and Representative Jim Davnie as well as Governor Pawlenty explaining the facts of reverse mortgages and the issues with the bill if signed into law. Actually I was the only person who testified during this legislation that has actually originated and processed reverse mortgages. The others who testified were all lobbyists, attorneys or had little knowledge and no experience with the details or originating reverse mortgages.

Some of the issues of the bill included a 10-day rescission period, originators determining suitability and cross-selling prohibition that those who do a reverse mortgage could not purchase insurance products within the 18 months after the reverse mortgage closing.

Governor Pawlenty’s veto letter stated that it is important that reverse mortgages continue to be offered in Minnesota and the legislation could have unintended consequences causing mortgage bankers to refrain from offering reverse mortgages. He stated the suitability clause was poorly written and would cause litigation. Governor Pawlenty encouraged the authors to rewrite legislation that protects seniors but does not limit the availability of reverse mortgages in Minnesota.

Early during the 2010 legislation session I heard through the grapevine that a FDIC bank was supporting and “pushing” a bill modeled after the California reverse mortgage law into this legislation session. For months now I have been researching to find details about this potential legislation but to little avail. While I was so involved during the 2009 legislation, and as an actual originator trying to educate the bill authors and legislators on reverse mortgages, the process and issues with their bill, I was not contacted by any of them to assist with any new legislation.

Last month the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA) stated that a senator was expected to add an amendment on reverse mortgages to a bill that was slated to pass. My research has continued and I have learned that, yes, the author of last year’s Senate bill is working on finding a bill to add the reverse mortgage amendment to but with no confirmation of which bill and/or the verbiage of the anticipated amendment.

I have also learned that a FDIC bank is working on verbiage for the reverse mortgage amendment. Not sure if this would be the same bill or two different bills. For some undetermined reason this legislative act has taken on a shroud of secrecy.

My concern with this process and any amendment that may be added to legislation is that this is a very controversial issue that could impact those of us who are brokers or lenders that are not federal chartered banks. We are not on the same playing field – federal chartered banks do not have to abide by the state rules because they are federal chartered yet brokers and non-federal chartered banks and lenders would have to follow any state laws.

What does this mean? If a 10-day rescission is implemented, the FDIC bank would still be working off the 3-day rescission; yet non-federal chartered banks and lenders would have to operate with the 10-day rescission. The same is true for a suitability clause and for cross-selling. This would be a monopolistic-like advantage over other lenders. This obviously does not foster fair competition between all lenders and small business. Is this the purpose of the FDIC Bank in supporting and pushing through legislation that they don’t even have to follow? Is this for their gain rather than for the seniors?

Additionally this legislation has not been transparent. We have not been able to find out exactly what the legislation entails. From what I have heard there is potential that it could be similar to or even worse than last year’s legislation but this is being kept a secret.

I feel that any reverse mortgage legislation should not happen without a full hearing. And without all of us impacted, especially brokers and lenders who are not federal chartered banks having an opportunity to see and address any proposed legislation. Without disclosing the information and keeping this a secret and not consulting those who it will actually be impacting (i.e. the non-federal chartered bank originators who actually work in the field on a daily basis and with the seniors) it appears legislators are not looking at protecting seniors yet looking out for their own political gain.

When we are trying to help homeowners stay in their home, receive help with their mortgages and/or avoid foreclosure it would be a disservice to seniors to pass Minnesota reverse mortgage legislation at this time. Additionally at this time when there are so many changes on the federal level through HUD affecting reverse mortgages, it will be a disservice to Minnesota seniors to pass state legislation adding to the confusion of the product.

Additional suggested reading:

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

You Need To Know Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Are Highly Protected!

Posted on March 7, 2010 by Beth Paterson, CRMP

Legislators, media, some senior advocate groups, and even the general public miss the point that reverse mortgage borrowers are already highly protected. With more protections than with any other loan or financial decision seniors make they still feel more protections are needed. Currently the only reverse mortgage is the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) which is insured by HUD. HUD has guidelines and requirements to protect seniors. Even when there were proprietary (private) reverse mortgage products, they followed HUD’s guidelines. While there are protections, seniors still have the right to make their own decisions, for better or worse. Let’s discuss these protections.

Third-party counseling is required on all reverse mortgages. Counseling is absolutely mandated with no exceptions and is provided by HUD trained and approved counselors. During the counseling sessions the counselors are required to follow a protocol approved by HUD. Evolving over time, HUD’s counseling guidelines and regulations now require distance between the counselors and lenders. Lenders are required to provide borrowers with a list of 5 local and 5 national counselors without steering borrowers to any specific counselor. Additionally, counselors are restricted from steering to lenders.
- The counselor’s role is to educate about reverse mortgages, explain the allowable fees, and terms of the loan so potential borrowers have an understanding of the reverse mortgage. They also provide other potential options. They counselors are not to make a decision for the borrower on whether they should or should not do the reverse mortgage.

Cross-selling is prohibited. Mortgagee Letter 2008-24 (HUD’s guidelines and requirements) states that a “HECM mortgage originator or any other party that participates in the origination of a FHA insured HECM mortgage shall not participate in, or be associated with, or employ any party that participates in or is associated with, any other financial or insurance activity.” Additionally if a lender or bank has financial departments they must demonstrate to the Secretary of HUD that they have and maintain “firewalls and other safeguards designed to ensure that (i) individuals participating in the origination of a HECM mortgage have no involvement with, or incentive to provide the mortgagor with, any other financial or insurance product; and (ii) the mortgagor shall not be required, directly or indirectly, as a condition of obtaining a mortgage under this section, to purchase any other financial or insurance product.”
- Lenders require mortgage brokers sign forms that they do not sell insurance and do not cross-sell.
- All lenders application packages have disclosures stating that annuities and/or other financial products are not required to be purchased with reverse mortgage funds.

HUD regulates the fees. HUD outlines what lenders and third-parties may charge stating they must be customary and reasonable costs necessary to close the mortgage. Mark-ups are not allowed. You may find HUD guidelines at their website (http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/ref/sfhp2-15.cfm) and in Mortgagee Letters 2008-34; 2006-07; 2006-04; 2004-18; 2000-10.

The Good Faith Estimate (GFE) must disclose all fees. RESPA (Real Estate Settlement and Protections Act) requires all fees be disclosed at the time of application, restricts what fees can be changed and for the fees that can be changed borrowers must receive new disclosures.

The Total Annual Loan Costs (TALC) must be disclosed. Providing a comparison of the percent of the costs to the amount received through the loan, this document discloses that the longer one keeps the loan the less expensive it is.

Sample Closing Documents must be provided at the time of application. HUD requires that borrowers must receive the sample closing documents as well as a booklet regarding home equity loans. This gives borrowers time to review the documents they will be signing at closing. They may also have family, trusted friends or their attorney review the documents during the processing.

Disclosures must be provided to borrowers at application. There are a variety of disclosures including:
- Non-borrowing spouse disclosures outlining the risks if a spouse will not be on the loan.
- Taxes and Insurances are the responsibility of the borrower(s).
- Annuities and/or other insurance and financial products are not required with a reverse mortgage.
  - If annuities are being purchased the costs of the annuity are to be included on the TALC.

Three-day Right of Recession. As with any refinance, there is a three-day right of recession giving the borrower(s) time to review and decide whether or not to proceed.

HUD insures and guarantees the funds. As a HUD insured loan the funds are guaranteed to be available to the borrower as long as the borrower(s) abide by the terms of the loan.

Non-recourse loan. Unlike any other loan, the reverse mortgage is a non-recourse loan which means there is no personal liability to the borrower or the estate as long as the borrower or their estate is not retaining ownership when the loan is due and payable.

There are guidelines for marketing practices. HUD, The Federal Trade Commission and industry associations review and have cracked down on misleading advertisements.

State licensing and the SAFE Act. Many states require mortgage brokers take test and receive licensing in order to originate loans including reverse mortgages. (Note: FDIC insured banks are exempt from these requirements.) The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) enhances consumer protections including encouraging states to establish minimum standards for licensing and registration of mortgage loan originators. The SAFE Act will establish and maintain a national mortgage licensing system and registry for the residential mortgage industry.

Protected MN Reverse Mortgage Borrowers

When doing other types of mortgages, loans or financial decisions seniors do not have all of these same protections. For example they do not have to go through counseling, have the same disclosures requirements, have regulated fees, are not guaranteed or have the non-recourse clause and often do not require the testing and licensing. Think about these situations that don’t have these same requirements or disclosures:

A reverse mortgage compares to a regular home equity loan in the fact that regardless of age the mortgages are used to finance lifestyle using the home equity. With a forward/conventional loan the funds are taken as a lump sum and can be used however one wishes.

If a senior is selling they have costs associated with sale and receive funds in a lump sum. No one is controlling how they use the remaining equity from the sale of the home. And they have to determine where they are going to live. If they are renting (i.e. regular apartment, independent living, or assisted living) the money may only last for a short period of time and they may still not have funds for future needs.

If the senior (or anyone) does a forward/conventional loan the funds are received in a lump sum. They can do whatever they want with this equity. And they have to make payments which can become difficult for them if “life happens.”

If they win the lottery they have money in a lump sum which can be spent however they wish.

With credit cards seniors (or anyone) are not restricted on how they are used. They can charge for whatever they want. And they then have created debt that has to be paid back on a monthly basis.

When you hear that seniors need to be “protected from the reverse mortgage” remember all these protections and know that seniors doing a reverse mortgage have more protections than any other loan or financial decision they make. As with any decision, especially financial or legal, one should be educated and understand the service or product. And while these protections are in place, the seniors still have a right to decide for themselves on whether the reverse mortgage is right for their situation.

Blog posts’ information is current as of date post published, program is subject to change in in the future. Contact us for current information, 651-762-9648.

This site or the information provided is not from, or approved by, HUD, FHA, or any US Government or Agency.

Minnesota Reverse Mortgages SIDAC

Minnesota Reverse Mortgage Information, Facts and News from the Experts Excelling in Service

Tag Archives: Legislation

Seniors Find Hope and Opportunity With Reverse Mortgages

Minnesota 7-Day Cooling Off Period Law is Disservice to Seniors

Reverse Mortgages Give Reasons For Hope

Fast Forward To August… Seniors Would Have Lost Their Home To Foreclosure Under New Minnesota Reverse Mortgage Law

A Letter to Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty Regarding Reverse Mortgages

Down To The Wire… The MN Reverse Mortgage Amendment Was Sneaked In and Likely To Have Negative Consequences For Seniors And Reverse Mortgage Businesses

Do You Know The Best Kept Reverse Mortgage Secret in Minnesota?

You Need To Know Reverse Mortgage Borrowers Are Highly Protected!